[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Stacey Kirby's good and bad sites
I decided to investigate some of the sites on the web that offer stock
photos. This is what I found:
Bad: http://www.triscan.com.au (Triscan company)
- site is boring and not enticing
- the choice of colors of fonts and backgrounds is bad and at some
points making the information hard to read
- not much content to the site
- there are four main links and two of them led to the same page
- the site is very flat
- the one animated graphic serves no purpose
- there is too much scrolling
Good: http://www.artville.com
- very interesting design...peaks curiosity of the reader
- easy navigation...good organization of buttons
- consistent design so the reader can always know where to find links
and heading of page each time (always a bar at bottom for navigation
which may be not be needed at times)
- no annoying useless animated graphics
- good search options
- good content
(background images could be toned down a bit though)