Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
To : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:11:28 -0700
Re: XF86FBDev Debian binary
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 05:53:23PM +0000, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> > > Yeah, I have alien installed, but would it work ok with rh6.0?
> > >
> > > With my matrox mystique? Would it be better than XF86_SVGA?
> >
> > It will if you use a framebuffer driver.
> >
> > It'll be slower than XF86_SVGA, but it'll also take much less memory.
>
> XGGI will be faster than XF86FBDev, and take less memory. ;)
And one of these days, it'll actually work too, instead of requiring I
run the server, change to a different console, and start running
clients...!
(using sleep to start things in the background hopefully after the server
starts up didn't work at all)
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have also been a huge Unix fan ever since I realized that SCO was not
Unix. -- Dennis Baker
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
iQEVAwUBNzCJy3RYxo9QvaDtAQEaLAf/QUMM/kzQu8LPGYWoc/oh1++4sk+sqau9
oO3p8x3kn4dIvcCFeLCr/MNwpLyyTU+LoID8i/zESuNbULICnrSNwIkzm704xsm3
IKJcONWvgbaFKN4Sv09O7vMk1lRdIs1ooy7FRxR3Dl7DDo33QAVCoPQAvdscPqE9
7ZBExKXp/IdAYWe6qReov/8/riJvqu+eZD6jzEcJmYJMxs0Pq7asvzA4EkbQYWC4
SJQ7WCFG+bUo2buJaTViTqkcVOQPfLJ6NA4J61IN381NQA11ZKdaUvipgo0tHm3e
jb6lOgFKQdD/N5FcNFeO+Yw2+XSuG9UtD1n1/DpbaPXhH5/BDCMFiQ==
=ZdDt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]