Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]
  From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
  To  : ggi-develop@eskimo.com
  Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:11:28 -0700

Re: XF86FBDev Debian binary

On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 05:53:23PM +0000, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> > > Yeah, I have alien installed, but would it work ok with rh6.0?
> > >
> > > With my matrox mystique?  Would it be better than XF86_SVGA?
> > 
> > It will if you use a framebuffer driver.
> > 
> > It'll be slower than XF86_SVGA, but it'll also take much less memory.
> 
> XGGI will be faster than XF86FBDev, and take less memory. ;)

And one of these days, it'll actually work too, instead of requiring I
run the server, change to a different console, and start running
clients...!

(using sleep to start things in the background hopefully after the server
starts up didn't work at all)

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have also been a huge Unix fan ever since I realized that SCO was not
Unix.           -- Dennis Baker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia

iQEVAwUBNzCJy3RYxo9QvaDtAQEaLAf/QUMM/kzQu8LPGYWoc/oh1++4sk+sqau9
oO3p8x3kn4dIvcCFeLCr/MNwpLyyTU+LoID8i/zESuNbULICnrSNwIkzm704xsm3
IKJcONWvgbaFKN4Sv09O7vMk1lRdIs1ooy7FRxR3Dl7DDo33QAVCoPQAvdscPqE9
7ZBExKXp/IdAYWe6qReov/8/riJvqu+eZD6jzEcJmYJMxs0Pq7asvzA4EkbQYWC4
SJQ7WCFG+bUo2buJaTViTqkcVOQPfLJ6NA4J61IN381NQA11ZKdaUvipgo0tHm3e
jb6lOgFKQdD/N5FcNFeO+Yw2+XSuG9UtD1n1/DpbaPXhH5/BDCMFiQ==
=ZdDt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Index: [thread] [date] [subject] [author]