Dear
SrEvaishNavites,
Kindly reer to the vyAkyanam-s
for
"kaLLa vEdathai koNdu
pOi purm pukka vARum,,," thiru-voi-mozhi 5-10-
and
"pundhiyil-samanar,
buthar enRivargaL othana pEasavum.." 9-8-9 of Periya
thirumozhi.
"
dAsan
vanamamalai
padmanabhan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:59
AM
Subject: Re: [Oppiliappan] Bhuddha as an
AvathAram ?
The Buddha who is considered as an avathara of
Sriman Narayana is NOT THE SAME AS the historical Buddha. In the Vishnu
Purana, there is the description of the Buddha Avathara which was taken to
teach a 'wrong doctrine' to the wives of the asuras. It is this Buddha
that is referred to as an incarnation in texts. The historical Buddha who
preached Buddhism is not an avathara.
For those who have heard
Annmacharyas Sankirtana "Dolayam" ....there is reference to
'Daaruna Buddha'... and by this the puranic Buddha is being
identified.In other sankirtanas, he mentions of Vishnu
having "incarnated to teach the wives of the asuras"...and again he is
referring to the 'Purainc' Buddha.
The doctrine preached by the
historical Buddha is undoubtedly antivedic....called as 'Sunyavada' and
has been elaborately rejected in the Sree Bhashya.
Please correct me
if i am wrong.
_______________________________________________________ Too much spam
in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE! http://in.mail.yahoo.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|