You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Aug 2005

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00018 Aug 2005

 
Aug 2005 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear SrEvaishNavites,
 
Kindly reer to the vyAkyanam-s for
"kaLLa vEdathai koNdu pOi purm pukka vARum,,," thiru-voi-mozhi 5-10-  and
 
"pundhiyil-samanar, buthar enRivargaL othana pEasavum.." 9-8-9 of Periya thirumozhi.
"
 
dAsan
vanamamalai padmanabhan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Oppiliappan] Bhuddha as an AvathAram ?

The Buddha who is considered as an avathara of Sriman
Narayana is NOT THE SAME AS the historical Buddha. In
the Vishnu Purana, there is the description of the
Buddha Avathara which was taken to teach a 'wrong
doctrine' to the wives of the asuras. It is this
Buddha that is referred to as an incarnation in texts.
The historical Buddha who preached Buddhism is not an
avathara.

For those who have heard Annmacharyas Sankirtana
"Dolayam"  ....there is reference to 'Daaruna
Buddha'...
and by this the puranic Buddha is being identified.In
other sankirtanas, he mentions of Vishnu having
"incarnated to teach the wives of the asuras"...and
again he is referring to the 'Purainc' Buddha.

The doctrine preached by the historical Buddha is
undoubtedly antivedic....called as 'Sunyavada' and has
been elaborately rejected in the Sree Bhashya.

Please correct me if i am wrong.


           
_______________________________________________________
Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam protection for FREE! http://in.mail.yahoo.com




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list