Sri: SrimatE Gopaladesika MahadesikAya Namaha, Dear Sriman Hari Swamin, Adiyen is most thankful for your note that clarifies any misconceptions caused by adiyen's carelessness. Namo Narayana, SriMuralidhara Dasan --- In malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "msharird" <mshari@xxxx> wrote: > SrI: > SrImathE rAmAnujAya nama: > Dear SrI VaishNavas, > > This reply is meant only for malolan net. I thank SrI MuraLidhara > RangaswAmi for the kainkaryam and eagerly looking forward for the > rest of SlOkams also from SrI pAdukA sahasram. I find in the mail > from SrI MuraLidhara RangaswAmi linkages based on the number 25. On > usage of certain terms, few have surely misunderstood certain aspects > that he was written. I too acknowledge that certain points in his > mail are misleading. Please go through my observations as follows: > > On his point 1: No comments on the count of aksharams in dwaya > mantram. But his words "a concept systematized into a science by > Swami NammAzhwar, Swami Alavandar, Sri Ramanujacharya, and Swami > Desikan" must not be misunderstood. The term "concept" is not in the > sense "hypothesis/idea" but it is a sAdyOpAyam known from the SAstra > (veda, smrutis, brahma sUtras, itihAsa purANams). The same applies to > the word "science". This should not be treated as the science which > is based on mere pratyaksham and mere anumAnam. Swami NammAzhwar, > Swami Alavandar, Sri Ramanujacharya, and Swami Desikan etc practiced > the sAdyOpAyam and explained/preached it in their works with para- > paksha nirasanams. > > On his point 2: "ma" is the 25th aksharam. > "ma" and "mA" are different in their meanings. As he has quoted the > name "mAdhavan", I think he is referring to "mA" and not "ma". The > term "mA" denotes thAyAr SrI mahA lakshmI and it also has other > meanings. The term "ma" which is the 25 th aksharam denotes 25 th > tatvam jeevAtma and few other things. Actually, "ma" based on its > roots-meanings, denotes the jeevAtma. His words "As a result of Her > eternal oneness with Lord Narayana, the Lord begets the name > Madhavan" is very misleading and it is also wrong. Many have taken > the meaning from his term "Oneness" as "SrI mahA lakshmI" > and "VishNu" are not two different Aatmas but Aatma-Ikyam is oneness. > This is wrong. SrI mahA lakshmI is a vibhu Chetana tatvam and VishNu > is another vibhu chEtana tatvam. Their eternal inseparable > association in all manners is such that they treated like a "single > tatvam" divya dampatis ? The brahma sabdam denotes the divya > dampatis. That is all. SrI tatvam is distinct from VishNu tatvam. The > Lord get the name "mAdhava" not because of oneness that he has as > mentioned but because VishNu is the Lord (pati) of SrI lakshmI (mA). > > On his point 3: I do not want to contradict the mathematical > reference that he has given. But the sAmpradAyaic artham which I have > heard from AachArya is that the name rAma: of SrIman nArAyaNan has > the capacity to convey all aspects ? 1. kAraNatvam (and > abAdyatvam), > 2. upAyatvam and 3. upEyatvam and hence repeated three times as > essence of sahasra nAma which deals with the kalyANa guNams of > paramAthma SrIman nArAyaNan. > > Thanks & Regards, > naidhruva mAdabhUshi S. HARI rAmAnuja dAsan (mshari@xxxx) > ============================================================ > --- In malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "rangaswamy_m" > <rangaswamy_m@xxxx> wrote: > > Sri: > > > > SrimatE Gopaladesika MahadesikAya Namaha, > > > > Dear Bhaktas, > > > > As of today, Sri Satakopan Swamin and adiyen have completed the > ...
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |