You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Apr 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00035 Apr 2004

 
Apr 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "amshuman_k" <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear Sri mahavishNu sharman:
> 
> Namaste. There was a deviation from the main thread from yajur-
vedic 
> legends to sanskrit grammatical syntax. Rest assured that I have no 
> intentions to re-write samskrta vyAkaraNam and I very well know the 
> differences between tenuis, tenuis aspirata, media, media aspirata 
> and nasalis forms of labial phonemes, despite the large gap (more 
> than a decade) between now and my formal sanskrit education.

Namaste

Please read my previous mail carefully alongwith what you have quoted 
below. Then you will understand how you are wrong.

Kindly be magnanimous enough to admit your mistake and do not bring 
Max Mueller et al. into picture. Such a state of mind can be attained 
only when you consider yourself to be a "dAsa".

upanishad(h) is also wrong and upanishat(h) is right unless there is 
a sandhi.

As my brother pANardAsan has rightly said

"samprAptE sannihita kAlE
nahi nahi rakShati dukrunjkaraNE" -- Adi Sankara

> "...Correct nominative singular form that you will find in any 
> dictionary or vedic text is triShTubh. You may find the form 
triSTup 
> only in sandhi as triSTupchandas- this is the form in the vedic 
> anukramaNikas.
> You may encounter a variant sandhi in AV chandas tarpaNaM mantra eg:
> triShTubgAyatryuShNikanuShtubjagati ...

The last line is not fool-proof. It has to be 
triShTubgAyatryuShNiganuShtubjagati....

Regards
Vishnu
> 
> So your guy is wrong..."
> 
> Best wishes & regards,
> KK





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list