Dear Sriman Kasturi Rangan, You have rightly analyzed the issue of Kaivalya mOksha and your opinion is mine. As I wrote in my previous mail, this issue is going to come up only in the future, in our website. The article is not yet made by the author. Before this, one article on Tamil literature, another on ThirukkaNNapuram are in queue. Right now we have only ashtaSlOkI at the follwoing URL: http://www.geocities.com/yatirajadasa/ashtasloki You may please send your comments to the id provided there . But please be cautious in the wording since thriumantrArtham is the most respected theory in the sampradAyam. you have developed very good insight into vEdas. But some of the passages as understood by you are seemingly against our sampradAyam. So please post such passages with a question mark in jetusa yahoogroups where you are a member, so that we will all be benefited by the opinion of the greatest vEdic ascetic of today. Ramanuja Dasan Vishnu - -- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "amshuman_k" <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote: > Dear Sri VishNu: > Please provide the URL of the website. Does the website discusses > other theological differences between the kalais too? > Let me also add one more thing to the original question - I am aware > that kaivalya, though inferior is not like christian hell, where a > soul burns for eternity (and hence the comparison between kaivalya > and hell is incorrect). However, I am not comparing kaivalya with > hell. My point is on the jIvan being indefinitely held there, when a > superior alternative exists. > > Thanks & regards, > Kasturi Rangan .K > > P.S. > I apologize if my posts have offended you in past. I don't have any > intention to offend a vaishNava.
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |