srImathE rAmanujAya namah
dear bhAgavathAs,
It is really an interesting debate that is going on re: "sAththivika
ahankAram". Though, smt. sumithra varadarAjan's and others' posts
seem convincing, it somehow does not seem right that something
termed as 'sAththvika ahankAram" can be part of our sampradAyam.
where embAr said "illai enakku edhir, illai enakku edhir", adiyEn
has always understood that statement to be the ultimate statement in
praising Ramanuja, rather than svami embAr being proud somehow of
himself. My understanding is that "As the beautiful vadivazhagu of
emperumAnAr is in my mind, there is no comparison to me" (or there
are no virOdhis for me). Please note that embAr does not say "Since
I have the beautiful vadivazhagu of emperumAnAr in my mind!"; it is
clear that the vadivazhagu of emperumAnAr is present in embAr's mind
only because of emperumAnAr's grace. So, I have difficulty
attributing any "ahankAram" - good, or bad to this statement.
Similarly, for "nin thanakkum kuRippaakil kaRkalaam kaviyin poruL
thaanE", I have always taken it to mean that AzhvAr wonders at
emperumAn's grace in which He has provided AzhvAr with the the most
perfect knowledge. Especially, in the previous pAsurams, AzhvAr
marvels that he saw emperumAn (kaNdu koNdEnE) with all kinds of
attributes in thiru-k-kaNNamangai. In the last pAsuram he starts
with "kaNNamangaiyuL kaNdu koNdEn enRu kaadhalaal kalikanRi uRai
seidha".. Does this not mean that thirumangai AzhvAr is saying that
those who recite these pAsurams will go to mEl ulagaNgaL not because
kaliyan said so, but because kaliyan was blessed by perumAL such
that he saw perumAL at thiru-k-kaNNamangai, and he described that?.
Doesn't this mean that the grace that perumAL showered on kaliyan at
thiru-k-kaNNa mangai was so great and abundant, and the resulting
knowledge is so pure that kaliyan marvels at His grace - "Oh Lord,
the truth be said, if You desired, even You can learn the meanings
of these words from me"?
If we say that AzhvAr/AchArya had "sAththivika ahankAram", does this
not mean that for that moment when they composed/sang the line which
we say denotes sAththivika ahankAra, they were thinking of
themselves? Can our AchAryAs/AzhvArs EVER think of themselves in
this manner? Did they not completely immerse themselves in our Lord,
and hence, is not everything they say ONLY praising/marvelling about
our Lord? (except in cases where they are in the mode of "koovi
koLLum kaaalam innum kuRugaadho? - even here, they cannot bear the
separation)
AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE SaraNam.
adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan,
varadhan
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |