Sri:
Srimathe Ramanujaya nama:
Srimathe Vara Vara Munaye nama:
Dear Sriman Lakshmi Narasimhan,
Humble praNAms to you. There is no paradox. Since I
come under aj~nAna prapanna(or probably worse than that),my reply is
based on my maNdUka knowledge! If I understand your mail little bit,
your second point(b) is there eternally. PerumAL choosing option (a)
is unquestionable as He is parathvam(hence He shows His saulabhyam
by becoming servants to His devotees). Our job is to do service with
love and that's it. Period. He becoming our servant or not is not
our problem. It is He who chooses whose disciple He wants to be. It
is perumAL who made the statement "vashe kurvanti mAm bhakta: sat
shriya: sat patim". No devotee said "perumAL becomes my servant".
Happiness/unhappiness,pApam/puNyam etc is relative not in the
jIvAtmA's eyes but paramAtmA's eyes.
Wrt AcAryA's position being superior, I don't know if
you're using the right word to convey what;s going on in your mind.
I was fortunate to listen and learn(some srI vacana bhUShaNam and
AcArya hrdayam) from Sri Chinna Jeeyar swamiji in person. Swamiji
explained very beautifully the AcAryA's position. Nowhere swamiji
used the word superior! We all perform actions. But what makes
people differ from each other is the attitude they carry behind that
action. If I digressed from your main point, please pardon me.
As Vishnu poined out in the earlier mail,I feel
sAtivIka ahankAram is against seshatvam. In AzhvArs cases(who come
under bhakta prapannAs) it is a different scenario. Even in such
cases, I don't think they prided themselves when they sang certain
pAsurams. Experts in NDP will explain on my behalf(as I'm novice in
that area). I feel if ordinary jIvAtmA like us has sAtivIka
ahankAram, in "no time" it will get converted into dangerous
ahankAram which will damage the soul forever! I request teh devotees
to forgive my blabberings.
AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE sharaNam
dAsAnu dAsI
NC Nappinnai
a)
> Do we just obey HIS orders and let him be our servant OR b) as we
are
> HIS servants and want to stick to SEshatvam, just ignore his
> happiness of wanting to be our servant? This confuses me. Could
> someone clarify(with some reference if possible)? For example, in
> case of Thirumanga Mannan or Raamanujar or Maamunigal, the lord
> wanted to be their disciple. They obliged. But, we must remember
> that, the very sthaanam of acharya indicates a superior position,
> whether the acharya feels so or not being a different issue. So,
if
> they accepted HIM as their disciple, it means, they were ok to
take
> up the acharya's position for the lord. And they knew that the
very
> position of acharya comes with a dangerous word "superior" hidden
> inside it. Is this acceptable? My apologies for my ignorance :(
>
> Adiyen,
> Ramanuja Dasan
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |