You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Jul 2004

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00090 Jul 2004

 
Jul 2004 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


nAdudai mannar
deemed possession and ownership

Lord krishNA went as an emissary of pANdavA-s who did not have any kingdom at 
that time. In fact, His mission was to recover the kingdom. 

In thiru-voi-mozhi nam-AzhwAr mentions Lord krishNA as an emissary of king who 
had the kingdom. How is it that?

As per Lord krshNA's esteemed opinion, the kingdom was theirs and hence, they 
were deemed as having the kingdom already.

the pAsuram runs as follows:
",..nAdudai mannarkku, dhUthu sel nambikku" 6-6-5;

EDu vyAkyAnam is excellent in this regard. Questioning the validity of 
mentioning that they possess the kingdom -when in fact the whole mission if for 
that purpose-when in fact dven a drop of land was refused to them- it is 
mentioned that :

" bhagavath abiprAyathAlEa avanai nAdudai mannar engiRAr kANum" 


The Lord deems pANdavAs as the possession of kingdom and that comes out as 
AzhwAr-s pAsuram.

The opinion of the Lord thus makes what is not as a deemed possession and 
ownership. Is it not?
vanamamalai padmanabhan







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list