You are here: SriPedia - Ramanuja - Archives - Nov 2002

Ramanuja List Archive: Message 00077 Nov 2002

 
Nov 2002 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear respected memebers

Please accept my namaskarams. I have been reading the book The 
Srivaishnava Theological dispute by Patricia Y Mumme and 
interestingly i find that this book is mentioned by a member of this 
group. I find the book very fascinating and the author goes to great 
lengths to emphasise the fact that both the aacharyas, Vedanta 
Desikan and Manavala Muni did not envisage of forming separate 
kalais. I have to admit that after reading the book i still am not 
clear about how and when exactly people started talking about 
separate kalais. I also have a couple of other doubts which i would 
like the memebers to clarify.
1) If prapatti is not considered as an upaya and is against the 
swarupa of the soul then how does one 'initiate' 
prapatti according to thenkalais? Is samarshayanam not considered as 
an 'action' among thenkalais?
2) If sri is considered as a jivatma, how is this jivatma different 
from others.

i request the enlightened members to clarify these doubts

adiyal
geetha






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list