Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha
Srimathe Vedhantha Desikaya Namaha
Srimath VaraVara Munaye Namaha
Respected Sri Vaishnava Baghavathas
Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan Sampath Kumar. This is my first question in this
scholarly forum. 
In our SriVaishnava Sidhantham it is established that Sriman Narayanan
residing in Vaikunta Lokam is parathvam and Krishna is avatharam
(Vibhavam) of Sriman Narayanan and Krishna is an expansion of Sriman
Narayanan. However, there are other schools of Vaishnavism (especially
Gaudia Vaishnavism) which staunchly advocate that Krishna is the
parathvam and Narayanan is a subform of Krishna. Even though both
these schools accept Sriman Narayanan and Krishna, why this
fundamental difference arise and which is correct?
Kindly accept adiyen's appologies if my question is inappropriate.
Adiyen
Ramanuja Dasan
Sampath Kumar...
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WwRTUD/SOnJAA/i1hLAA/VkWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 
 
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
|                                                                
   
   Home Page
   
    http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia  |                
                                                    
   srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list  |