Was Percy ever involved in the debate on molest ations by Catholic priests?

Nelson nelson at newulmtel.net
Wed May 8 16:01:56 EDT 2002


I would totally second that point.  if only Percy were still here and
involved in the high-profile debate.

It seems to me Percy's response would be both complex and morally clear. I
> think he would understand the fact, pardon the vulgarity, of buggerers. As
a
> scientist of the human condition, he would note it as one more "covert
> lewdness." I think he would point out the fashionable fallacy of the
> "solution" of married priests. I think he would properly lambaste the
> corpulence and arrogance of those Cardinal Bernard Laws who have spent far
> too much time in sirloin and lobster dinners with the Church's sugar
daddies
> than in tending to their flocks. And I think he would reaffirm those
things
> of the Church and faith which are beyond the depredations of bad men. I've
> never much cared for hypothesizing in this manner, but still I do it, and
so
> I welcome any challenges.
>
> R Pauley
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karey Perkins [mailto:karey at charter.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 6:06 PM
> To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
> Subject: [percy-l] Re: Was Percy ever involved in the debate on
> molestations by Catholic priests?
>
>
> My comment was more about the fact that married priests are the answer to
> the "dearth of priests" that now exist in the American Catholic Church,
and
> the fact that many very qualified, quality young men who would like to be
> priests are not choosing that profession due to the celibacy requirement,
so
> that there is now a crisis in the church when it comes to its leadership.
>
> Pedophiliacs, as Wade had said already, will gravitate to any profession
> that provides access to children.  Boy scouts, teaching, coaching,
> priesthood.  (Whether or not these are married professions or not.)
> Unfortunately, these are the professions (and those in those professions)
> that we usually hold to be most admirable, because they involve mentoring
> children.
>
> KP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson [mailto:nelson at newulmtel.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:16 PM
> To: Percy-L: Literary and Philosophical Discussion
> Subject: [percy-l] Re: Was Percy ever involved in the debate on
> molestations by Catholic priests?
>
>
> >And, are married priests the answer, as might be the >logical conclusion
> >given America's dearth of priests, the recent >pedophilia scandals,
>
> I am a lurker mostly but this idea I have never understood. how would
being
> married cut down on child abuse in the church? lots of married men many
men
> in secular world indulge in pedophilia.
>
> Thanks!
> Ryan Nelson
>
>
> --
> An archive of all list discussion is available at
> <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>.
> Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>.
>
>
> --
> An archive of all list discussion is available at
> <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>.
> Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>.
>
> --
> An archive of all list discussion is available at
<http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy/hypermail>.
> Visit the Walker Percy Project at <http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy>.
>




More information about the Percy-L mailing list