[percy-l] Kramer's new book

J Rivas-Pita juliorivas at gmail.com
Sat Jun 25 14:16:07 EDT 2005


Let me venture a possible answer.
Percy is "gotten wrong" by people who'd rather get him wrong than
having to realize that they lead a wrong life -an unaunthentic life.
In kirkergaardian terms, familiar to most on this list, when you
realize that you lead a wrong life you have but two choices left:
repent and change (I'm not meaning those words in their
televangelistic meaning of course) or make a decision to go the wrong
way fully aware, taking responsability for your choice.
Much more comfortable to get Percy (or life) wrong...

Regards,
Julio

On 6/25/05, Bryon McLaughlin <BMclaughlin at nazarene.org> wrote:
> If Percy is often "gotten wrong," can someone on the list explain what areas is often gotten wrong, and possibly more importantly, WHY?  Why is he gotten wrong?  Is it that he is hard to understand, that he was at time cryptic?  Why?  Thanks.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: percy-l-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Robert_Pauley at oxy.com
> Sent: Fri 6/24/2005 5:26 PM
> To: percy-l at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: RE: [percy-l] Kramer's new book
> 
> 
> "However, to me he gets Percy quite wrong."
> 
> Everybody does. Percy is the most "gotten wrong" writer in American letters. With the exception of this fine list, of course.
> 
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: percy-l-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:percy-l-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Robert Eckert
>         Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 8:01 AM
>         To: percy-l at lists.ibiblio.org
>         Subject: [percy-l] Kramer's new book
> 
> 
>         Dear List,
> 
>         Peter Kramer, the author of _Listening to Prozac_, recently published _Against Depression_.
> 
>         The last chapter of _LP_ is "The Message in the Capsule" and deal extensively with Percy. Kramer corresponded with Percy at some point.
> 
>         However, to me he gets Percy quite wrong.
> 
>         On p.265 of _AG_ Kramer writes:
> 
>         "...Percy's position blurs distinctions we might want to make. It overstates the case only slightly to say that for Percy, there is no difference between treating epilepsy and treating
>         alienation. Both are best approached via faith and revelation, not technology."
> 
>         It amazes me that Kramer could have read Percy's nonfiction, which he states he has (e-mail), and miss Percy's use of the Dyadic/Triadic distinction, especially:
> 
>         "I can even visualize the hospital of the future in which the first signs the patient sees in the corridor do not read INTERNAL MEDICINE, SURGERY, OB-GYN, DERMATOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY UPSTAIRS, but rather two big signs just inside the front door, one pointing left, one right (I won't say which is which), but one reading DYADIC DISORDERS; the other, TRIADIC DISORDERS."
> 
>         To Percy, the distinction is so profound that he feels the very architecture of the hospitals of the future could be based upon it!
> 
>         It is a shame that Kramer has broadly disseminated such a profound and fundamental misreading of Percy's work.
> 
>         Robert Eckert
>         Rochester, New York
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
>         Yahoo! Sports
>         Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=33539/*http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com?ovchn=YAH&ovcpn=Integration&ovcrn=Mail+footer&ovrfd=YAH&ovtac=AD>
> 
> --
> An archive of all list discussion is available at http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/percy-l/
> 
> Visit the Walker Percy Project at http://www.ibiblio.org/wpercy
> 


-- 
Be Happy! (Fr. Benito Ballesteros, OSB, 1924-1996)
Sé feliz! (P. Benito Ballesteros, OSB, 1924-1996)



More information about the Percy-L mailing list