Jonathan Robie wrote:jtauber wrote:[1] note that the GBI Syntax Trees don't model subordinating conjunction that way so need a little bit of tweaking to extract the necessary diagnosis
But we may want to talk with Randall and see if this enhancement could be done. I don't know how feasible that would be.
I suspect I could do it as part of my dependency conversion but I don't necessarily want to diverge too much.
I believe the GBI Syntax Trees still enable the necessary diagnostic, it just has to be formed differently. I think it's even possible with my dependency version.
For example: does every instance of καθώς have a 'conj' relationship to a verb head that in turn has a CL relationship to another verb head? Well it turns out only in 113 out of 182 times.
Here are the full results:
113 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a V-
12 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a N-
10 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a None
8 καθώς is a conj of a N- that is a CL of a V-
5 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a A-
4 καθώς is a conj of a RP that is a CL of a V-
4 καθώς is a conj of a A- that is a CL of a V-
3 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a ADV of a V-
3 καθώς is a conj of a N- that is a CL of a N-
3 καθώς is a conj of a A- that is a CL of a A-
2 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a RP
2 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a D-
2 καθώς is a conj of a RP that is a CL of a N-
2 καθώς is a conj of a RP that is a CL of a A-
1 καθώς is a conj of a V- that is a CL of a RD
1 καθώς is a conj of a RD that is a CL of a N-
1 καθώς is a conj of a N- that is a CL of a RP
1 καθώς is a conj of a N- that is a CL of a D-
1 καθώς is a conj of a N- that is a ADV of a V-
1 καθώς is a conj of a D- that is a CL of a None
1 καθώς is a conj of a D- that is a CL of a N-
1 καθώς is a conj of a A- that is a CL of a None
1 καθώς is a conj of a A- that is a CL of a N-