και ο θανατος και ο αδης εβληθησαν εις την λιμνην του πυρος ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος εστιν η λιμνη του πυρος
Most of the fairly literal translations render the verse as:
Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
My question is about the second sentence. In the Greek, the "is" (εστιν) is placed between "second death" and "lake of fire", and reads literally: "This, the second death, is the lake of fire." And yet, every single English translation that I've seen says "This is the second death, the lake of fire."
Why is the "is" shifted when translating the Greek into English?
Revelation 20:14
Forum rules
This is a beginner's forum - see the Koine Greek forum for more advanced discussion of Greek texts. Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up.
When answering questions in this forum, keep it simple, and aim your responses to the level of the person asking the question.
This is a beginner's forum - see the Koine Greek forum for more advanced discussion of Greek texts. Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up.
When answering questions in this forum, keep it simple, and aim your responses to the level of the person asking the question.
Re: Revelation 20:14
The word order in Greek is very flexible, and usually reflect emphasis and rarely difference in meaning. I don't remember seeing "ουτος + noun clause" ever being appositional, is there? From what I know "ουτος" is a determiner and "determiner + noun clause" is the typical construction in which the determiner functions like an adjective (apart from being without an article) and modifies the noun clause. So if that were the case "ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος" would mean "this second death", which does not make sense because no "second death" was previously mentioned. Rather, "ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος εστιν" has "ουτος" as the subject and "ο θανατος ο δευτερος" as the predicate, which is usually in front of the copulative verb anyway.Ron Demler wrote:και ο θανατος και ο αδης εβληθησαν εις την λιμνην του πυρος ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος εστιν η λιμνη του πυρος
Most of the fairly literal translations render the verse as:
Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
My question is about the second sentence. In the Greek, the "is" (εστιν) is placed between "second death" and "lake of fire", and reads literally: "This, the second death, is the lake of fire." And yet, every single English translation that I've seen says "This is the second death, the lake of fire."
Why is the "is" shifted when translating the Greek into English?
δαυιδ λιμ
-
Ron Demler
- Posts: 3
- Joined: September 20th, 2011, 7:03 pm
Re: Revelation 20:14
Thanks David. My Greek knowledge is extremely rudimentary, so I'll need to study more to be able to translate what you just saidDavid Lim wrote: The word order in Greek is very flexible, and usually reflect emphasis and rarely difference in meaning. I don't remember seeing "ουτος + noun clause" ever being appositional, is there? From what I know "ουτος" is a determiner and "determiner + noun clause" is the typical construction in which the determiner functions like an adjective (apart from being without an article) and modifies the noun clause. So if that were the case "ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος" would mean "this second death", which does not make sense because no "second death" was previously mentioned. Rather, "ουτος ο θανατος ο δευτερος εστιν" has "ουτος" as the subject and "ο θανατος ο δευτερος" as the predicate, which is usually in front of the copulative verb anyway.
Does this explanation look right to anyone else?
-
Mark Lightman
- Posts: 300
- Joined: May 6th, 2011, 6:30 pm
Re: Revelation 20:14
Hi, Rob,Rob wanted to know:
Does this explanation look right to anyone else?
Yes, David's explanation is as right as rain.
-
Ron Demler
- Posts: 3
- Joined: September 20th, 2011, 7:03 pm
Re: Revelation 20:14
Great. Thanks for the input!Mark Lightman wrote:
Hi, Rob,
Yes, David's explanation is as right as rain.
p.s. it's Ron