Acts 2:22-24

Jonathan Robie (
Sun, 10 Nov 1996 08:42:27 -0500

I have several questions about Acts 2:22-24. First, a question about style
(which pertains to the whole context, not just these verses). I haven't read
any Greek rhetoric in the original, but I assume that this is more or less
the style of classical Greek rhetoric, since it sounds like something I
could imagine in a Cecil B. DeMille movie (in the original Greek versions
of his movies, before they were dubbed). Am I right here? But this is Peter
addressing a bunch of Jews. Why would he choose a classical Greek rhetorical
style? Is there a parallel in the Jewish tradition? To what extent does this
match the style that would be expected of a Jew addressing other Jews? If it
doesn't match, why not?

Acts 2:22 (GNT) Andres Israhlitai, akousate tous logous toutous: Ihsoun ton
Nazwraion, andra apodedeigmenon apo tou qeou eis umas dunamesi kai terasi
kai shmeiois ois epoihsen di autou o qeos en mesw umwn kaqws autoi oidate,
23 touton th wrismenh boulh kai prognwsei tou qeou ekdoton dia ceiros anomwn
prosphxantes aneilate, 24 on o qeos anesthsen lusas tas wdinas tou qanatou,
kaqoti ouk hn dunaton krateisqai auton up autou.

Acts 2:22 (NASU) "Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene,
a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God
performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know--23 this
[Man], delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God,
you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put [Him] to death. 24
"But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it
was impossible for Him to be held in its power.

More questions:

In verse 22, why is Ihsoun accusative in the phrase "Ihsoun ton Nazwraion"?
I expected that to be a direct object of something, and I made my way all
the way to the end of verse 24 without encountering a subject to match it.

In verse 22, "dunamesi kai terasi kai shmeiois", I assume this is an
instrumental dative? (I'm still struggling with these categories.) If this
is an instrumental dative, is there any virtue in classifying it with a more
detailed subcategory?

In verse 23, can anyone help me parse "touton th wrismenh boulh kai
prognwsei tou qeou"? I think I'm missing the force of the dative in "th
wrismenh" and the meaning of the combination "th wrismenh boulh".



Jonathan Robie
POET Software, 3207 Gibson Road, Durham, N.C., 27703
Ph: 919.598.5728 Fax: 919.598.6728
email:, <--- shockwave enabled!