I have a question about PARRHSI/A|, which appears in Mk 8:32. 
Schlier (in Kittel) derives it from PA=N + R(H=-, and Liddell &
Scott derive it from PA=S + R(H=SIS.  Fred Burnett has suggested
to me that this PARRHSI/A| is echoed in the R(H=MA in Mk 9:32,
which I find very interesting.  Any comments?  Would a phrase
such as TO\ PA=N TO\ R(H=MA (with or without articles) make sense
(regardless of whether anyone actually used it)?
George Aichele
Adrian College