On Mon, 21 Nov 1994 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> I am probably very MUCH oversimplifing this, but one reason theos does
> not have the article is then there would be two subjects in the clause,
> this would allow for polytheism. If I have misunderstood this, please,
> correct my thinking!! :)
o theos En o logos would not have 2 subjects; it would have a subject and
predicate that would probably be understood as identical in reference.
There is no hint of polytheism.
theos En o logos means that the logos can be understood as being God, but
not that logos and theos are necessarily equivalent expressions.
Harvard Divinity School