Mt. 18:3

Maurice A. O'Sullivan mauros at iol.ie
Fri Aug 20 09:40:10 EDT 1999


Apologies to the list:
I now see that STRAFHTE is a regular _2nd_ aorist form --- it is only in 
the 1st. aorist form that the change from E to A in the stem occurs in the 
dialects.


At 11:43 20/08/99 +0100, you wrote:
>In Mt. 18:3, there occurs STRAFHTE -- 2nd aorist subjunctive passive of STREFW
>As I began to look at the change from E to A, I saw that BAGD lists this 
>2nd aorist passive as occurring ( in addition to Homer ) in pap., LXX, and 
>several examples from Josephus.
>
>This might lead one to think that this was a Koine form, or at least 
>something that emerged around the turn of the era --- at least I might 
>have <g> had I not turned to Smyth s.586 where I find this note:
>
>b. Liquid stems of one syllable change e to a,
>                     as te-ta-mai, e-ta-thên (teinô stretch, ten-). But
>                     strephô turn, trepô turn, trephô nourish have
>                     estrephthên, etrephthên, ethrephthên (rare),
>                     though the perfect middles are estrammai,
>                     tetrammai, tethrammai.
>
>                     586 b. D. estraphthên is Ionic and Doric; Hom.
>                     and Hdt. have etraphthên from trepô. Hom. has
>                     etarphthên and eterphthên from terpô gladden.
>
>[ as you can see I have left the Perseus transliteration intact ]
>
>Which raises a more general query:
>How much of what might be seen as Koine forms are in fact the persistence 
>of long-standing dialect forms which in course of time and usage 
>predominate over "pure" Attic
>( = literary ? ) forms?
>
>Perhaps Carl, Edgar et al.  might have examples that come to mind --- I 
>don't expect any sweeping generalisations from scholars <g>
>
>A subsidiary query, on the specific verse:
>The widespread translations
>RSV, NAB:   "Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and ....
>NRSV: "Truly I tell you, unless you change
>
>turns the passive into an active, to accommodate the English usage.
>Why not a middle form, rather than a passive, in the original, I wonder?
>
>BTW,  in the Matthean use of " turn " I detect a very direct connection 
>with the OT use of SHUV, literally "turn", in the physical sense, for the 
>idea of repentance which in Greek becomes METANOIA, an intellectual concept.
>
>Regards,
>Maurice
>
>
>Maurice A. O'Sullivan
>[ Bray, Ireland ]
>mauros at iol.ie
>
>Confucius said: "To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study
>is dangerous."
>Analects 2:15
>
>
>---
>B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
>You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: mauros at iol.ie
>To unsubscribe, forward this message to 
>$subst('Email.Unsub')
>To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu
>



Maurice A. O'Sullivan  [ Bray, Ireland ]
mauros at iol.ie





More information about the B-Greek mailing list