This usage is quite rare

Mark Wilson emory2oo2 at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 16 23:52:49 EDT 2000



What is the practical value of this statement I read in grammars:

"This usage is quite rare."

For example, Dr. Daniel Wallace uses this expression in his discussion on 
the Gnomic Aorist.

"This usage is quite rare in the NT." (pg. 562, GGBB)

The examples he cites seem beyond "conclusive."

So what difference does it make if the occurrences of this construct are 
rare? Does this help us in any way when considering a specific passage? Can 
we understand 1 Pet. 1:24 in any other way than a gnomic?

For example, I might, on theological grounds, see several Gnomic Aorists in 
Romans 5:12-21. For me, the Gnomic is not as "rare" as it is with Wallace. 
But this seems to define "grammar" from a theological viewpoint. This is a 
bit uncomfortable to me.


In fact, I seem to recall Wallace (??) suggesting that Passives are more 
frequent among Middle/Passive forms, but does not this reflect, to some 
extent, his theological bent?.............. Yes! It is Wallace. I just 
openned to page 418. His comment is remarkable to me:

"Second, in the perfect tense, the middle-passive form is always to be taken 
as a passive in the NT (Lk 6:40, 1 Cor. 1:10, Heb. 11:3)."

As far as I am concerned, his example in 1 Cor. 1:10 could be easily taken 
as a middle. "perfectly join yourselves together..."

This seems to be circular reasoning.

I guess I am having a hard time seeing any utility in "this usage occurs 
quite infrequently."

Thank you,

Mark Wilson

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




More information about the B-Greek mailing list