Future Passive Indicatives in NT

Paul S Dixon dixonps at juno.com
Tue Dec 10 16:38:52 EST 2002


On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:37:50 +0300 "Iver Larsen" <iver_larsen at sil.org>
writes:
> >
> > At 9:49 AM -0600 12/10/02, Paul S Dixon wrote:
> > >I did a count of the future passive indicatives in the NT (Logos
> > >software) and came up with 296 hits (*QHSO* or *QHSE* or *QHSH* 
> and not
> > >*QHSIO*).
> > >
> > >Anybody get a different count?
> >
> > Accordance shows 297 hits for future passive (QHSe/o)
> > morphoparadigm--pretty close. Now, the question is how many of 
> these
> > actually have a passive SENSE?
> > --
> 
> The Friberg tags have 276 verbs marked indicative, future passive, 
> and 10
> marked indicative, future, passive deponent (like the verb 
> APOKRINOMAI). I
> found it difficult to search for *QHSE*, because that search in my 
> database
> will include forms like QHSEI, the future active of TIQHMI.

That makes your total 286, I believe.  But, both yours and Carl's
searches omit QHSHi (2nd person singular form).  In addition, yours
omitted the QHSO form.  Mine included both of them; hence, my total of
296 might be more accurate ( I assume Carl's search missed one 2nd person
singular form in the NT).

I just ran a search with my above parameters, plus an additional and not
QHSEI.  I got the same count: 296.  Apparently QHSEI does not occur in
the NT.

> 
> How many are passive in sense? From a quick look, I would say most 
> of them.

Interesting.

Paul Dixon

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/attachments/20021210/4f2a33ec/attachment.html 


More information about the B-Greek mailing list