Future Passive Indicatives in NT (Correction)
Paul S Dixon
dixonps at juno.com
Tue Dec 10 17:11:09 EST 2002
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:38:52 -0600 Paul S Dixon <dixonps at juno.com>
writes:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:37:50 +0300 "Iver Larsen" <iver_larsen at sil.org>
writes:
> >
> > At 9:49 AM -0600 12/10/02, Paul S Dixon wrote:
> > >I did a count of the future passive indicatives in the NT (Logos
> > >software) and came up with 296 hits (*QHSO* or *QHSE* or *QHSH*
> and not
> > >*QHSIO*).
> > >
> > >Anybody get a different count?
> >
> > Accordance shows 297 hits for future passive (QHSe/o)
> > morphoparadigm--pretty close. Now, the question is how many of
> these
> > actually have a passive SENSE?
> > --
>
> The Friberg tags have 276 verbs marked indicative, future passive,
> and 10
> marked indicative, future, passive deponent (like the verb
> APOKRINOMAI). I
> found it difficult to search for *QHSE*, because that search in my
> database
> will include forms like QHSEI, the future active of TIQHMI.
That makes your total 286, I believe. But, both yours and Carl's
searches omit QHSHi (2nd person singular form). In addition, yours
omitted the QHSO form. Mine included both of them; hence, my total of
296 might be more accurate ( I assume Carl's search missed one 2nd person
singular form in the NT).
I just ran a search with my above parameters, plus an additional and not
QHSEI. I got the same count: 296. Apparently QHSEI does not occur in
the NT.
Oops, correction. It does occur once in Matthew and once in Luke. A
more accurate count yet is 294. Or, so it seems.
Paul Dixon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/attachments/20021210/f2e03915/attachment.html
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list