Relative pronoun and agreement
Carl W. Conrad
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Sun Dec 29 15:42:51 EST 2002
At 12:18 PM -0800 12/28/02, waldo slusher wrote:
>I think this was recently discussed, but I did not
>quite catch the conclusion, if one was reached. As
>pertaining to relative pronouns, what 'rules' have
>been offered to explain why a relative pronoun might
>agree with 1. a predicate nominative in its clause or
>2. its antecedent of an antecendent clause ?
Waldo, check BDF §132, Smyth §2502d,
--
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad at ioa.com
WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list