Neuter plurals - singular imperatives
Carl Conrad
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu
Wed Nov 27 09:37:43 EST 2002
> Thanks for the responses, they put me on the right track. I had a QUICK look
> at the LXX and found a couple of relevant examples there.
>
> Gen 1:20 EXAGAGETW TA UDATA
> Gen 1:22 TA PETEINA PLHQUNESQWSAN
>
> Apparently the grammatical rule has not been strictly applied by the
> translator of Genesis. If the situation is different in other books (and if
> it is a construction ad sensum: animated vss not animated) goes well beyond
> what I wanted to know in the first place.
Sorry, I assumed your question was about the GNT; I didn't check the LXX.
Certainly these examples from Genesis do show that there's no consistent
observance of the rule of singular verb with a neuter plural subject. But
I
think that's what we observe in the GNT with indicatives: that we
sometimes
have a singular verb with a n.pl. subject and sometimes a plural verb.
--
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu OR cwconrad at ioa.com
WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list