EPISPAOMAI in 1 Cor 7:18
Richard A. Stauch
rstauch at charter.net
Tue Sep 17 18:36:26 EDT 2002
Hi Charles and Mark,
I think Mark has swerved into it. The whole context helps us understand
a little more about what Paul means here. Paul seems to be saying that
God calls a person right where that person is. If one is Jewish, God
does not intend that person to cease to be Jewish. If God calls one who
is a Gentile, God does not expect that one to cease to be a Gentile. The
circumcision, being a work of the flesh, is a sign of Jewishness, not of
the calling. It seems Paul is going deeper than the mere act of
circumcision, but to the whole life: If God calls one just as one is,
then to change who one is mitigates, even negates the calling.
As for the word itself, this appears to be a compound word (EPI + SPAW;
on, over + draw, pull [out]). BDAG (EPI, at 7) tells us that it is
sometimes used to indicate "in addition to". 4 Maccabees 5:2 uses a very
similar word (EPISPASQAI) in a very similar context, which most of my
lexica connect to this one, but BDAG disagrees. Here we might think of
Paul saying "don't add circumcision [as though to change who you were
when you were called]." God calls one just as one is, so don't think you
have to change who you are {as though by one's own efforts one can make
the calling "complete."}
Peace,
Richard Allan Stauch
Long Beach, CA
http://www.rstauch.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Wilson [mailto:emory2oo2 at hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:02 PM
> To: Biblical Greek
> Subject: [b-greek] Re: EPISPAOMAI in 1 Cor 7:18
>
>
>
> Just thought I would offer this highly speculative question:
>
> >Does anyone have any information on the use of the NT hapax
> EPISPAOMAI
> >("to
> >remove the marks of circumcision")in 1 Cor 7:18.
>
> Seems that EPISPAOMAI is used often in the sense of being
> "drawn away," perhaps more mild, to be "allured," or more
> harsh, to be "dragged."
>
> Could it be that Paul is commanding those who had been
> circumcised not to be drawn away or allured by the
> non-circumcised party? After all, the next sentence is to
> those who are uncircumcised not to be drawn into the
> circumcised party (and presumedly be circumcised).
>
> What I am assuming then is not that these were being asked to
> somehow reverse circumcision (an impossibility), but that
> they were being ask to withdraw from one party (here, the
> circumcized party) to the opposing party, this by attraction
> or allurement. This is similar to the party lines found in
> Chapter 1. "I am of Paul..." Here, the party lines are drawn
> based on some ritual mark on the body, or lack thereof.
>
> My thoughts,
>
> Mark Wilson
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> You are currently subscribed to b-greek as:
> [rstauch at charter.net] To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek at franklin.oit.unc.edu
>
>
>
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list