[B-Greek] John 6:51
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Polycarp66 at aol.com
Tue Mar 18 10:22:32 EST 2003
In a message dated 3/18/2003 8:37:51 AM Eastern Standard Time,
willker at chemie.uni-bremen.de writes:
> Same as mine!
>
> Best wishes
> Wieland
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Polycarp66 at aol.com [mailto:Polycarp66 at aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:29 PM
> To: willker at chemie.uni-bremen.de; b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [B-Greek] John 6:51
>
>
> In a message dated 3/18/2003 4:02:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> willker at chemie.uni-bremen.de writes:
>
>
> John 6:51
>
> Nestle-Aland
> KAI O ARTOS DE ON EGW DWSW
> H SARX MOU ESTIN
> UPER THS TOU KOSMOU ZWHS.
>
> Byzantine text
> KAI O ARTOS DE ON EGW DWSW
> H SARX MOU ESTIN
> ***HN EGW DWSW ***
> UPER THS TOU KOSMOU ZWHS
>
> I always assumed that there is no real difference in meaning here, but
> came across a book by Bousset (Studien NT, 1894) where he calls the NA
> reading "nonsense" (by the omission 'nonsense' has been created).
> Maybe somebody can explain to me, ignorant, what's the point here?
>
>
>
> What version of N-A are you using? mine reads
>
> EGW EIMI hO ARTOS hO ZWN hO EK TOU OURANOU KATABAS; EAN TIS FAGHi EK
> TOUTOU TOU ARTOU ZHSEI EIS TON AIWNA, KAI hO ARTOS DE ** hON EGW DWSW **
> hH SARC MOU ESTIN hUPER THS TOU KOSMOU ZWHS.
>
Then there is no omission. The difference is between hHN (N-A) and hON
(Byz). I don't see that any "nonsense" is created here. If anything, the
Byz text has created nonsense by trying to make the relative pronominal
object of DWSW agree with ARTOS rather than SARC. According to the critical
text it is his body which Christ gives rather than bread.
gfsomsel
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list