[B-Greek] QEOS a proper name?
Ron Fay
roncfay at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 27 00:13:44 EDT 2004
>
>Dear Friends, did QEOS ever achieve a proper name status in the Pauline
>letters ( I am including here the "disputed letters" as well) as a
>reference to the Father? I understand that CHRISTOS was used by Paul as a
>proper name for Jesus, although it was originally titular (as "the anointed
>one"). If this is the case, does the presence of the article with QEOS and
>CHRISTOS render these words titular rather than proper names? Many thanks.
>
>Tony Costa
I would argue that it never took on the status of a name, but it was likely
a title (thus allowing for a broadening of meaning). See Bacukham's "God
Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament." The Didsbury
Lectures, 1996. Carlisle: Paternoster, 1998. (US edition: Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1999), though he only has discussion of a few passages.
If anyone has any specific resources on this, I'd love to know as I am oging
to be doing some research in this area.
- Ron Fay
________________________________________________
Ron Fay
Ph. D. student and New Testament Fellow
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
Deerfield, IL.
roncfay at hotmail.com
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list