[B-Greek] Grandville sharp and Ha Elohim
Steve Westfall
steve.westfall at comcast.net
Mon Apr 4 00:37:38 EDT 2005
Just for the record, the man's name was "Granville Sharp", not "Grandville
Sharp". Also, it is "Waltke and O'Conner", not "Walke and O'Conner".
Steve Westfall
-----Original Message-----
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
kgraham0938 at comcast.net
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:48 AM
To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Grandville sharp and Ha Elohim
That is the question, is Qeos in Titus 2:13 a proper noun?? Or is it just a
common noun.
I was saying that normally Qeos is not thought of as a proper noun, so most
people use Titus 2:13 as a verse that justifies the deity of Christ.
[including myself].
But, when I came across that article in Walke and O' Conner, I began to
think that maybe Qeos in Titus 2:13 is a proper noun, since it is based off
of ha' Elohim and maybe Titus 2:13 does not apply to Grandville rule.
I was wondering what does everyone else think of Qeos in Titus 2:13.
--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 at comcast.net
-------------- Original message --------------
> ___________________
>
> You didn't finish your thought: "Because normally we don't think of hO
> Qeos as a proper noun" -- what's the rest of the sentence? What
> happens because we don't normally think of hO QEOS as a proper noun?
>
> Regarding Granville Sharp and his rule: It specifically excludes
> proper names so that it would then be inapplicable to Tit 2.13.
>
>
>
> george
> gfsomsel
> ___________
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list