[B-Greek] phonological flow & syntactical structure

Eric Biggs ericb at gracechurchreno.org
Thu Apr 28 15:33:21 EDT 2005


> Eric Biggs:
> Chomsky in this work, on pgs. 79-83 speaks of "formal similiarities
> between
> phonology and syntax". With this I looked at some rules of phonology
> [+continuant] [+voiced]/-[+voiced], which is diagramed on pg. 82 as an
> example of these similiarities. He goes on "These conventions allow us
> to
> apply rules to any class of segements specifed by a given combination of
> features, and thus to make use of the cross classification of segments
> provided by the feature representation. These notions can be adapted
> without essential change to representation of lexical categories and
> their
> members, providing a very natural solution to the cross-classification
> problem and, at the same time, contributing to the general unity of
> grammatical theory". pg. 82.

James:
What Chomsky is saying here is that the feature structures developed as
part of the formalization of phonological theory could be used in the
formalization of lexical categories. Features structures allow a more
expressive classification of objects than mere hierarchy allows.

Eric:
Then, I wonder if any research has been done on this.  However, my intention 
on this list concerning phonology and syntax were only in questioning 
pronunciation.  I know that this subjuect now turns away from B-Greek 
intention, so I would enjoy any imput off-list.  James thanks for your help 
on directing me to W Sydney Allen's book "Vox Graeca", in addition to 
correcting my thoughts and keeping me on track with what Chomsky is talking 
about....

...back to the drawing board.

Eric Biggs
zealous student
Reno, NV 




More information about the B-Greek mailing list