[B-Greek] simple test *AURION HLQON

Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at ioa.com
Tue Dec 13 15:37:07 EST 2005


On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Jim West wrote:

>
>
> Randall Buth wrote:
>
>> Yes, that misses the point about what aspect is. An event that has  
>> not
>> yet happened may still be viewed perfectively. Note the following:
>> "He will write"
>> "He will be writing"
>> Both are future, but in fact, only the second "he will be writing" is
>> imperfective in aspect.
>
> How can one say, though, that "he will be writing"?  He MAY be  
> writing.
>   But he WILL be- that's a whole other animal altogether.  And unless
> one presumes omniscience it simply makes no sense.  Even your "he will
> write" is nonsensical.  He may indeed write, or he may choose to  
> write.
>   But he WILL?  Such a statement has nothing to do with "aspect"  
> unless
> one stands well above the arena and looks down in timelessness at a
> particular point in the future.

As I noted earlier today, Modern Greek has two futures:

	NA GRAYEI: "he will write" (= "he will get it written (e.g. before  
tomorrow morning)"
	NA GRAFEI: "he will be writing" (= "he will be writing (e.g. while  
you sleep tonight)"

And I think that indicates that these futures are perfectly  
acceptable in English as well — and the semantic difference between  
the two formulations is pretty clearly aspectual.

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Emeritus)
1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
cwconrad2 at mac.com
WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/




More information about the B-Greek mailing list