[B-Greek] aorist participle of subsequent action
kgraham0938 at comcast.net
kgraham0938 at comcast.net
Sun Nov 6 21:04:53 EST 2005
Acts 16:6 DIHLQON DE THN FRUGIAN KAI GALATIKHN CWRAN KWLUQENTES hUPO TOU AGIOU PNEUMATOS LALHSAI TON LOGON EN THi ASIAi
doing a paper on Galatian contraversy, came across the argument by Wallace that the aorist participle KWLUQENTES could be taken subsequent to the action of DIHLQON.
They went through the Phrygian-Galatian region, but were then forbidden by the Holy Spirit from speaking the word in Asia.
You think this is possible? Not doubting Wallace, I just don't know if this is something to support a southern view.
--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 at comcast.net
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list