[B-Greek] aorist participle of subsequent action

kgraham0938 at comcast.net kgraham0938 at comcast.net
Sun Nov 6 21:04:53 EST 2005


Acts 16:6 DIHLQON DE THN FRUGIAN KAI GALATIKHN CWRAN KWLUQENTES hUPO TOU AGIOU PNEUMATOS LALHSAI TON LOGON EN THi ASIAi

doing a paper on Galatian contraversy, came across the argument by Wallace that the aorist participle KWLUQENTES could be taken subsequent to the action of DIHLQON.

They went through the Phrygian-Galatian region, but were then forbidden by the Holy Spirit from speaking the word in Asia.

You think this is possible?  Not doubting Wallace,  I just don't know if this is something to support a southern view.

--
Kelton Graham 
KGRAHAM0938 at comcast.net


More information about the B-Greek mailing list