[B-Greek] aorist participle of subsequent action
Elizabeth Kline
kline-dekooning at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 7 00:42:08 EST 2005
On Nov 6, 2005, at 6:04 PM, kgraham0938 at comcast.net wrote:
> Acts 16:6 DIHLQON DE THN FRUGIAN KAI GALATIKHN CWRAN KWLUQENTES
> hUPO TOU AGIOU PNEUMATOS LALHSAI TON LOGON EN THi ASIAi
>
> doing a paper on Galatian contraversy, came across the argument by
> Wallace that the aorist participle KWLUQENTES could be taken
> subsequent to the action of DIHLQON.
>
Unless you read with DIELQONTES the Byzantine Text this proposal is
improbable.
ACTS 16:6 DIELQONTES DE THN FRUGIAN KAI THN GALATIKHN CWRAN
KWLUQENTES UPO TOU AGIOU PNEUMATOS LALHSAI TON LOGON EN TH ASIA
PROSFUS in the following has been cited (See Acts ICC Barrett) as an
example of an aorist participle of subsequent action.
Valerius Babrius Scr…, Mythiambi Ae…, Sect. 2, fable 143, l. 3
143 1
ECIN GEWRGOS EKPNEONT hUPO YUCOUS
LABWN EQALPEN: ALL EKEINOS hHPLWQH
THi CEIRI PROSFUS, KAI DAKWN ANIHTWS
EKTEINEN [AUTON TON QELONT ANASTHSAI.]
Elizabeth Kline
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list