[B-Greek] Differentiation in Erasmian Vowels?
Randall Buth
ybitan at mscc.huji.ac.il
Fri Aug 11 08:13:16 EDT 2006
>Well, I honestly don't think that the pronunciation one adopts in the
classroom matters very much UNLESS one is making a serious effort to
speak and write Biblical or Classical Greek (or whatever historical
form of the language). IF one is going to make that effort, then I
think that modern Greek pronunciation may be useful, but if it's
Biblical Koine, I'd push Randall Buth's system. There is certainly
one virtue to the traditional Erasmian (even if ONLY one): the
differentiation of the vowel sounds as enunciated.
Carl W. Conrad>
I appreciate the commendation and agree with his overall appraisal.
Carl is right that classroom pronunciation only begins to take on
importance when one makes an effort to speak. (One could add that
speaking an ancient language makes most sense when trying to
internalize the language [deepen and broaden one's automatic grasp],
in appreciating the oral impact of of ancient presentations, and in
more rapid language learning.) Carl's last item about differentiation
could use some expansion for many who think that they are in that
category.
Traditional Erasmian does not differentiate all of the 11 vowel graphs.
(EU, AU, HU could be added to the discussion, though they pattern
differently than EI, OU, OI and are omitted for simplification in
this email.)
I count sounds 10 in a 'full' Erasmian I, EI/H, E, AI, A, W, O, OU,
OI, U [umlaut]. However, US Erasmian tends to ignore the U-umlaut,
and merges this with OU (e.g., people say LOUW 'I wash' when they
mean LUW 'I loose'). Plus, a version of US Erasmian also merges O
with A, bringing the total vowel count down to 8 for that dialect.
I am happy to admit that those 8 or 9 or 10 vowels show more
differentiation than the 7-vowel KOINE system. But they do not meet
the goal of one sound to one symbol.
In addition to that figure of eight or nine US-Erasmian vowels, it
should also be noted that the merged sounds join the wrong vowels
together. Thus, Erasmian joins EI to H, contrary to the early
Hellenistic Greek merger of EI to I; O to A (in some US Erasmian
dialects); and U to OU where the Koine and Attic preserved separation.
I know that there are publishing companies out there that are
publishing the 8-vowel system. That seems an unfortunate choice since
it neither preserves a sound//graph bidirectionality, nor lines up
with any historical dialect. Companies and teachers who cherish sound/
graph bidirectionality would be better served with the reformed Attic
of Allen-Daitz. That system does preserve the differentiation that is
often claimed or desired for Erasmian. Yes, it would entail that most
seminary teachers adopt something knew, but recordings allow a new
standard to be set for the next generation. It is very doable. The
publishers for seminaries would then need to decide if they wanted
something that would better fit Classics studies (Allen-Daitz), or
something historical for the NT (a 7 vowel Koine), or something
historic (a five vowel modern). I really don't think an 8 vowel US
'rasmian is the best use of current technology. it doesn't preserve
differentiation.
ERRWSQE
Randall Buth
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list