[B-Greek] Titus 2:13 / Revelation 12:14

George F Somsel gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 25 14:41:39 EDT 2006


Obviously, I'm not Harold, but I will say that simply because something is possible does not mean that it is preferable (assuming it is possible, but I don't recall what the discussion was).  What is preferable is what conforms to the common usage or to the usage of the author.
   
  __________
  

William Ross <woundedegomusic at gmail.com> wrote:
  Thank you Harold.

Might not the following actually refer to posession?

TO SWMA THS hARMATIAS

"the body belonging to sin"?

Regardless, though, of the ability of the genitive to be adjectival, the
most compelling factors seem to be:

* the fact that "appearance of the glory" is available - which
contra-indicates resorting to the adjectival reading
* the context in which two appearances are contrasted:


11 [->]epefanh[<-] gar h cariv tou yeou swthriov pasin anyrwpoiv

12 paideuousa hmav ina arnhsamenoi thn asebeian kai tav kosmikav epiyumiav
swfronwv kai dikaiwv kai eusebwv zhswmen en tw nun aiwni

13 prosdecomenoi thn makarian elpida kai [->]epifaneian[<-] thv doxhv tou
megalou yeou kai swthrov hmwn cristou ihsou

Ie: The context places us between two appearances - one past, one future.

Would you agree, at least, that this reading is grammatically possible, and
hence preferable to the adjectival? And if not, then what in the context or
grammar is compelling toward and adjectival function for the genitive noun?

Thanks so much for your response.

William Ross
VGB, Argentina



On 8/25/06, Harold Holmyard wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> >This question was not addressed. I also would like to know how
> thisconclusion was reached as it does not at all appear correct to me.
> >
>
> HH: If you mean Jason's question about the adjectival use of the
> genitive being a Semiticism, Dan Wallace's _Greek Grammar beyond the
> Basics_ suggests that it is not a Semiticism. He says that the force of
> the genitive is generally adjectival (p. 76). He defines it as the case
> of qualification and occasionally separation. As qualification, it
> defines, describes, qualifies, restricts, and limits. It is similar to
> the adjective but more emphatic. He has a category called the
> adjectival genitive and says that it really touches at the heart of the
> genitive. There is an attributive genitive, which allows a translation
> for EPIFANEIAN THS DOXHS like "glorious appearing." Wallace gives the
> example of "body of sin," TO SWMA THS hARMATIAS (Rom 6:6), which can be
> understood as "sinful body."
>
> > I wouldthink that Paul is referring to "the appearance of the glory" for
> severalreasons:
> >* Paul uses the adjectival form many times, so he is not thinking
> Hebrewabout the correct way to be adjectival* in other places, Paul uses the
> noun form exclusively as a noun, as far asI can see.* Paul's greek is
> perfect as he was a highly literate, natural born greekspeaker and only
> employs "semitisms" when he is quoting the LXX (which arethen technically
> "septuagintisms" I should think)* the context is his contrasting the
> appearance of [the time of] "god'sfavor" in the preceding verse with the
> appearance of "glory"
> >Am I mistaken on any of these points?
> >
> >
>
> >Also, if "the Great God" is conceived of as a title that would only apply
> tothe one true god, would this then indicate that Sharp's Rule does not
> apply?
> >
>
> HH: No, Sharp's Rule does apply. See Wallace at pages 270-290, where
> there is a discussion of this passage in particular. There is no proper
> name disqualification of the rule here in the Tit 2:13 phrase. A word
> like QEOS is different than a proper name because it can be pluralized
> (QEOI), but proper names cannot.
>
> >In effect, doesn't the appearance of the definite article "clash"
> withhHMWN?
> >
> >
> >
> HH: You cannot always do one-for-one literal translating and then judge
> by the English, for Greek grammar works differently than English grammar.
>
> Yours,
> Harold Holmyard
>
> >On 8/15/06, Jason Hare wrote:>> Carl,>> This is a bit
> off-topic of the present discussion (attributive v.> predicate> position and
> article-noun linkage), but I was just wondering -- since you> mentioned that
> THS DOXHS ôçò äïîçò is functioning adjectivally in Titus> 2:13> -- if this
> is a semiticism.>> In other words, do you think that Paul was using
> something similar to the> Hebrew construct phrase? Or it a natural feature
> of the Greek language to> link two nouns together (using the genitive in the
> second) to express a> adjectival relationship?>> Best regards,> Jason>>> On
> 8/15/06, Carl W. Conrad wrote:> >> >> > On Aug
> 14, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Jason Kerrigan wrote:> >> > > Revelation 12:14: TOU
> AETOU TOU MEGALOU, reads, "great eagle."> > > Likewise I have bellieved
> that: THS DOXHS TOU MEGALOU in Titus 2:13> > > would read, "Great Glory."
> Can anyone shed some light on why> > > MEGALOU would be descriptive of the
> antecedent noun in Revelation> > > 12:14 but not in Titus 2:13? I am open to
> correction.> >> > Jason, this is Greek 101, lesson 3 or 4: positions of the
> article in> > relation to adjective and noun when all are in agreement as
> to> > number, gender, and case:> >> > Standard Attributive position: TO MEGA
> BIBLION: "the big book" --> > (article, adjective, and noun are all neuter
> singular; the adjective> > is "sandwiched" between the article and the
> noun)> > Alternative Attributive position TO BIBLION TO MEGA: "the big
> book"> > or "the book, the big (one)" -- the article-noun group is followed
> by> > a repeated article and adjective agreeing with the noun; the function>
> > of the repeated article here is to reference the immediately> > preceding
> noun and relate the adjective to that preceding noun; this> > is very
> similar to apposition of "the book" and "the big one" and it> > is also very
> similar to a relative clause with ellipsis of the verb:> > "the book which
> (is) big."> >> > Note that in both these constructions the adjective is
> "embraced" by> > the article which, like the adjective, has the same
> number, gender,> > and case as the noun.> >> > Different from the above are
> versions of the Predicate position:> >> > MEGA TO BIBLION, TO BIBLION MEGA
> -- in both these formulations the> > verb "be" is in ellipsis (that's
> standard Greek practice). Both> > formulations mean "The book is big."> >> >
> The formulation in Rev 12:14 is what I have above called the> > "Alternative
> attributive position": TOU AETOU TOU MEGALOU is the> > genitive-case form of
> "the eagle, the big (one)" or identical in> > meaning to "the big eagle.">
> >> > But in Titus 2:13 you're isolating elements that belong together> >
> grammatically () and linking elements that don't belong together> >
> grammatically> >> > PROSDECOMENOI THN MAKARIAN ELPIDA KAI EPIFANEIAN THS
> DOXHS TOU> > MEGALOU QEOU KAI SWTHROS hHMWN IHSOU CRISTOU ...> > lit.
> "awaiting the happy expectation and appearing of the glory of> > our great
> God and savior Jesus Christ ... "> >> > THS DOXHS is genitive singular
> feminine dependent upon the preceding> > noun EPIFANEIAN (here functioning
> as if it were an adjective: "of> > glory" = "glorious), but TOU MEGALOU QEOU
> KAI SWTHROS hHMWN is> > genitive singular masculine dependent upon the
> preceding noun> > EPIFANEIAN: "appearing of our great God and saviior."> >>
> > In sum, you could not at all view the relationship between TOU AETOU> >
> TOU MEGALOU and THS DOXHS TOU MEGALOU as comparable if you really> >
> understood something that is very basic to ancient Greek syntax. You> > have
> focused upon the superficial fact that the phrases you've cited> > from Rev
> 12:14 and Titus 2:13 each consist of a genitive article and> > genitive noun
> followed by another genitive article followed by> > another genitive form in
> agreement with the article -- but you have> > failed to see the syntactic
> relationship of the elements in the> > larger group and have actually
> isolated THS DOXHS TOU MEGALOU from> > the larger syntactic group in which
> it belongs.> >> > Carl W. Conrad> > Department of Classics, Washington
> University (Retired)> > 1989 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828)
> 675-4243> > cwconrad2 at mac.com> > WWW: http://www.ioa.com/~cwconrad/> >> >>
> > ---> > B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek> > B-Greek
> mailing list> > B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org> >
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek> >>>>> --> Jason A.
> Hare> jaihare at gmail.com> Joplin, Missouri (USA)> ---> B-Greek home page:
> http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek> B-Greek mailing list>
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>



-- 

William Ross
VGB, Argentina
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek



george
gfsomsel
_________
 				
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Next-gen email? Have it all with the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.


More information about the B-Greek mailing list