[B-Greek] Is PALIN in Heb 1:6 ambiguous?
George F Somsel
gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 11 22:23:47 EST 2006
And so? #4 is a marker of contrast, and hINA is "a marker to denote purpose." All that indicates is that it introduces speech which was my point in noting the entry for EISAGW in LSJ which seems to indicate that the word is used to introduce speech as well -- not a "coming." It's still an adv. Calling it a "discourse discourse" doesn't change that fact nor does it add much to the evidence for the use of EISAGW since there are non-discourse uses of PALIN as well.
george
gfsomsel
_________
----- Original Message ----
From: Elizabeth Kline <kline_dekooning at earthlink.net>
To: George F Somsel <gfsomsel at yahoo.com>
Cc: greek <b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:19:04 PM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Is PALIN in Heb 1:6 ambiguous?
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:42 PM, George F Somsel wrote:
> Discourse marker? It's an adverb.
See Danker's 3rd Ed. under PALIN #3 "Marker of discourse ..."
Elizabeth Kline
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list