[B-Greek] Matt 16:18

Bob Fuller rjfjr at mn.rr.com
Wed May 17 19:54:12 EDT 2006


 One more thing. It could be that the reference is to the phrase, the
formulaic wording SU EI PETROS. We are getting perilously close to
out-of-bounds here, but I do not see that such a reference does anyone any
particular good. Simply giving Cephas a new designation is not, in itself,
significant.

Bob Fuller

-----Original Message-----
From: b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-greek-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:34 PM
To: B Greek
Subject: [B-Greek] Matt 16:18

hOTI SU EI PETROS, KAI EPI TAUTHi THi PETRAi...

Without illiciting any theological discussion on what/who the rock is, is it
fairly clear grammatically/syntactically to conclude that the introductory
clause SU EI PETROS, in that it is painfully obvious (stating the obvious),
must in some way function as a set-up for the forthcoming PETRAi word usage?
Or, are there any other grammatical/lexical considerations that must be
considered in this extented context?

Mitch Larramore
Sugar Land, Texas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek





More information about the B-Greek mailing list