[B-Greek] Jn 1:1 - Alternate Reading?
George F Somsel
gfsomsel at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 5 14:12:05 EDT 2006
Moffatt's translation was somewhat unorthodox and idiomatic and did not find favor with all sections of the church. I cannot answer as to why any particular translator would choose to translate as he does absent an express statement regarding his intentions, but I refuse to be drawn into discussions of unitarianism, modalism, adoptionism or any other theological viewpoint since that is outside the purview of this list. Suffice it to say that I think Moffatt was mistaken at this point.
george
gfsomsel
_________
----- Original Message ----
From: "Awohili at aol.com" <Awohili at aol.com>
To: b-greek at lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 1:56:37 PM
Subject: Re: [B-Greek] Jn 1:1 - Alternate Reading?
In a message dated 10/05/2006 10:17:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
gfsomsel at yahoo.com writes:
Somehow I would question whether this is a "fairly knowledgeable" scholar
(although I know him to be so in certain areas) since the only instance I note
in which BDAG cites it as an adjective meaning "divine" is in the Epistle of
Ignatius to the Magnesians where it appears as a genitive. While LSJ does
give instances, I would not rely too heavily on sources outside the
Judaeo-Christian circle for such since it may not reflect the usage in the
Judaeo-Christian tradition (and I'm not speaking of "Holy Ghost Greek").
So, then, is QEOS at John 1:1c definite, indefinite, or qualitative?
And what is the difference between a qualitative rendering and the
translation "the Word was divine," as with Moffatt and others?
And what is the difference between "the Word was God" and modalism?
Thanks,
Solomon Landers
---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
B-Greek mailing list
B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list