[B-Greek] MH and TAUTA in 2 Peter 1:9
Nick Lamme
nlamme at midamerica.edu
Wed Apr 2 15:37:12 EDT 2008
2 Peter 1:9
9 hW GAR MH PARESTIN TAUTA, TUFLOS ESTIN
MUWPAZWN, LHQHN LABWN TOU KAQARISMOU TWN PALAI AUTOU hAMARTIWN.
Why is MH used with a verb in the present, active, indicative? Is this an exception to the rule
or is there another reason for it?
AND
Is TAUTA nominative or accusative? I am leaning on nominative, cf. 1:8, although my references disagree.
Thanks,
Nick Lamme
Pole Tavern, NJ
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list