[B-Greek] MH and TAUTA in 2 Peter 1:9
Carl Conrad
cwconrad2 at mac.com
Wed Apr 2 17:00:33 EDT 2008
On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:37 PM, Nick Lamme wrote:
> 2 Peter 1:9
>
> 9 hW GAR MH PARESTIN TAUTA, TUFLOS ESTIN
> MUWPAZWN, LHQHN LABWN TOU KAQARISMOU TWN PALAI AUTOU hAMARTIWN.
>
> Why is MH used with a verb in the present, active, indicative? Is
> this an exception to the rule
> or is there another reason for it?
Because it's a conditional construction.
> AND
>
> Is TAUTA nominative or accusative? I am leaning on nominative, cf.
> 1:8, although my references disagree.
It is the nominative subject of PARESTIN; how it might conceivably be
accusative is altogether beyond me.
Although one could English this as "If anyone lacks these things ... "
but the construction itself actually says, "If these things aren't at
hand for somone ... "
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list