[B-Greek] Rom 3.23 and temporal implicature

Mitch Larramore mitchlarramore at yahoo.com
Sat Apr 19 23:27:50 EDT 2008


PANTES GAR hHMARTON KAI hUSTEROUNTAI THS DOXHS TOU
QEOU

I am wondering how the finite verbs in the aorist KAI
present tenses impact each other. Does one have
precedence over the other, or is there any "rules" to
go by to help an exegete accurately translate this
verse? Assuming the aorist and present are to be
understood in their temporal relationship, does the
present tense (following an aorist) denote
"consequence"? All sinned and consequently ...



Mitch Larramore
Sugar Land, Texas


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ



More information about the B-Greek mailing list