[B-Greek] Aquinas' Second Argument
Albert Pietersma
albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Sun Oct 24 21:21:22 EDT 2010
On Oct 24, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Michael Baber wrote:
> The Latin text states, "Prima autem et manifestior via
> est, quae sumitur ex parte motus." It is translated into
> English as, "But the first and apparent (obvious) way
> is that taken from _____ motion."
>
> How would one translate the Latin word parte in this
> context while maintaining the most literal translation
> possible (without sacrificing style)?
Since "motus" is a fourth declension noun and "ex" takes the ablative,
"motus" should here no doubt be read as a genitive. Also, to be noted
is that "manifestior" is comparative degree. Thus a 'most literal
translation' would run: "But the first and more obvious way is, that
which is taken from the part of motion."
Albert
>
> Thank you,
> Mike
>
>
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/bgreek
> B-Greek mailing list
> B-Greek at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-greek
>
—
Albert Pietersma PhD
21 Cross Street,
Weston ON Canada M9N 2B8
Email: albert.pietersma at sympatico.ca
Homepage: http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~pietersm
More information about the B-Greek
mailing list