From: Charles David Miller (malik@unm.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 22 1995 - 16:51:39 EDT
On Fri, 22 Sep 1995, Mark O'Brien wrote:
>
> Original message sent on Fri, Sep 22 9:25 AM by cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu (Carl
> W. Conrad) :
>
> > I don't think I would read Mk 2:6-7 to mean that Jesus claimed to BE
> > God but that he claimed authority which, in their view, only God
> > could legitimately claim
> I see your point and the distinction you are making. You may well be right in
> drawing a distinction between claiming to be God and claiming to have the
> authority of God... I need to ponder that one for a while.
>
> Another passage come to mind... how would you interpret Peter's confession in Mt
> 16:16?
But Jesus using the term Abba for God, which indeed may be authentic,
denotes a different relationship to God than prophets or priests used.
Also, Jesus did not *speak* as a representative of God (like the prophets
said they did) but *worked* deeds and did things that no prophet had ever
done.
Chuck Miller
___________________________________________________________________________
Charles David Miller, University of New Mexico (graduate student in
philosophy, with an emphasis in philosophy of psychology) Department of
Philosophy Home: (505) 867-1892 Work: (505) 883-5959
"God grant the philosopher insight into what lies in front of everyone's
eyes.
[Moge Gott dem Philosophen Einsicht geben in das, was vor allen Augen
liegt.]
--Ludwig Wittgenstein
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:27 EDT