From: Jim Brooks (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 23 1996 - 18:06:19 EDT
I'm working on a sermon for this passage and don't know which way to take
Jesus' brothers (ie the younger progeny of Mary and Joseph, named in Matthew
13:55 as James, Joseph, Simon and Judas). Verse 5 of this passage clearly
states that they were unbelieving at this point of Jesus' ministry. On first
glance, I thought their statements to Him in vv. 3-4 were the sarcastic
remarks of the unbelieving.
But now I wonder.
The latter part of v. 4 is ei tauta poieis ("if you do these things"). I was
somewhat surprised to see a first class conditional statement here, I was
expecting a 3rd or 4th. If my grammars are correct, a 1st class conditional
statement shows that the speaker believes that the condition or statement is
actual or possible. Thus having the idea of a more concrete "since" rather
than a somewhat nebulous "if." Certainly the brothers at least heard of
Jesus' miracles and probably even witnessed one or two (perhaps in John 2 at
the wedding). If so, then the 1st class statement shows that they actually
believed that Jesus was performing miracles.
In John 2:23-25; 4:45; 6:2, 26, etc., the condemnation is made that many
"believed" in Him simply because of the signs they saw. IOW, it was not a
genuine faith but superficial. Is it possible that His brothers were in this
category as well and that their comments to Him in John 7:3-4 were not
sarcastic at all but their attempt to help Him gain some publicity and
gather a larger following (especially after the "diaster" of chapter 6 where
many left Him)?
| Jim Brooks
Pastor, Grace Community Church
PO Box 537
Elma, WA 98541
For lack of wood the fire goes out,
And where there is no whisperer, contention quiets down.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:54 EDT