Re: Heb 11:16b...

From: Carl W. Conrad (
Date: Fri Jan 03 1997 - 11:27:56 EST

At 8:13 AM -0600 1/3/97, Carl W. Conrad wrote (to his great embarrassment):
>This is relatively straightforward; I suspect it's the word order you find
>confusing: (1) AUTOUS is the object of the complEmentary infinitive

I can't believe I wrote that! Carlton is, of course, absolutely right;
AUTOUS cannot be governed by the infinitive EPIKALEISQAI; it MUST be
understood as an object of EPAISCUNETAI, although I wonder whether it is
really so much a direct object as an acc. of respect, as EPAISCUNOMAI tends
to be intransitive.

Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018 OR

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:01 EDT