From: Tom Launder (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jan 04 1997 - 02:54:32 EST
Hi and thanks to all who have helped,
I just want to make sure that I understand correctly what I have been
DIO OUK EPAISXUNETAI AUTOUS O QEOS QEOS EPIKALEISQAI AUTWN
Qeos | epaisxunetai | autous
o ouk |
| // epikaleisQai | Qeos
| | / autwn
I have understood epikaleisQai to be a complimentary inf and Qeos to a
predicate nominative. I believe that Prof. Winbrey understands the
infinitive as result rather than complimentary.
So did I understand this correctly?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:01 EDT