From: Gregory and Carol Yeager (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jun 23 1997 - 18:47:14 EDT
Paul Dixon wrote concerning the NIV and the now defunct NIV(inclusive):
> Good point. Piper probably was interpretive here. Better to stay away
> from interpretation in translation, as much as possible.
Are you talking about the New International Version, which made famous
the idea of "Dynamic Equivalency?" This is most puzzling. I thought
interpretation was a foundation of that school of thought. Now when I
see the NASB(Inclusive) THEN I'll know we're in trouble!
My $0.02 for what that's worth!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:19 EDT