From: Roy Millhouse (RRMILLHO@hewitt.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 1997 - 10:48:28 EDT
>I don't think that this is correct. Their ratings of the certainty of the
text has changed (almost >always expressing greater certainty), and while
UBS 3 was set in hot lead, the 4th edition was >electronically typeset (and
that for the worse look, IMO), but the base text is the same.
I was under the same impression: the text of UBS4 is the same as UBS3, but
the ratings and the choice of variants listed in the apparatus had changed,
not to mention the ugly font.
MA\NT in progress
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:24 EDT