hHKW/hHKASIN in Mk 8:3--pf or pres?

From: Rod Decker (rdecker@bbc.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 15 1997 - 08:46:30 EDT

This is prob. a traditional crux, but should hHKASIN in Mk 8:3 be parsed as
a perfect form or a present form? I find it listed as a pf in BDF s.101 and
(I assume*) BAGD, 344. But Gramcord/Accordance parses it as a present, as
does Mounce (both in his Analytical and in his Morphology) and
Brooks/Winbery (Morphology, 136 n. 1--which also lists *BAGD as supporting


 Rodney J. Decker Baptist Bible Seminary
 Asst. Prof./NT P O Box 800
 rdecker@bbc.edu Clarks Summit PA 18411
 http://www.bbc.edu/courses/BBS/RDecker/Index.htm USA

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:33 EDT