Re: hHKW/hHKASIN in Mk 8:3--pf or pres?

From: Jim West (
Date: Wed Oct 15 1997 - 09:20:10 EDT

At 08:46 AM 10/15/97 -0400, you wrote:
>This is prob. a traditional crux, but should hHKASIN in Mk 8:3 be parsed as
>a perfect form or a present form? I find it listed as a pf in BDF s.101 and
>(I assume*) BAGD, 344. But Gramcord/Accordance parses it as a present, as
>does Mounce (both in his Analytical and in his Morphology) and
>Brooks/Winbery (Morphology, 136 n. 1--which also lists *BAGD as supporting

unlike all those you site, I take it as a "kappa" aorist.


> Rodney J. Decker Baptist Bible Seminary
> Asst. Prof./NT P O Box 800
> Clarks Summit PA 18411
Jim West

Adjunct Professor of Bible,
Quartz Hill School of Theology

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:33 EDT