From: A. Brent Hudson (
Date: Tue Oct 28 1997 - 22:24:28 EST

<html><html><head></head><BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><font size=4 color="#000000" face="Times New Roman">Eric wrote: </p>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial">&gt;So would Romans 3:22 be &quot;but the righteousness - i.e., God - through faith of Jesus Christ&quot;???? That doesn't make too &gt; much sense to me.</p>
<p><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><br>I should have written Rom 3.21 as her primary text. &nbsp;Those who are interested in Jervis' argument can simply read her article (or email me privately and I will email that section of her article to you). &nbsp;However, if I were to follow this interpretation; I would translate 3.21,22 as:<br><br>But now, apart from the Law, Righteousness, that is God, has been revealed by which the Law and the prophets [both] testify. &nbsp;But Righteousness, that is God, [is now revealed] through faith in Jesus Christ {or *faithfulness of Jesus Christ*} to all who believe, for there is no distinction. . . <br><br>Let me reiterate that I am not defending this position and I am definitely not representing her full argument. &nbsp;I just thought it was an intriguing proposition.<br><br>Brent Hudson<br><br><br><br><br><br></p>
<p><font size=2 face="Arial"><br><br><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><br></p>
<p><font size=4><br><br><br>==================================<br>A. Brent Hudson<br>Pastor, Kincardine Baptist Church<br>Kincardine, ON&#009;N2Z 2J1<br><font color="#0000FF"><u></u><font color="#000000"><br>==================================</p>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:38:35 EDT